Saturday, May 18, 2013     News feed

‘Breivik can be sent back to prison’

December 2, 2011  

Norway’s worst mass murderer since World War II may still wind up in a high-security prison, despite being declared insane this week by court-appointed psychiatrists. The fate of Anders Behring Breivik has dominated Norwegian media all week, and now one of his main prosecutors seems to be easing public fears that he may some day be set free.

Prosecutor Inga Bejer Engh told newspaper Klassekampen on Friday that both a relatively new law and legal precedent allow for Breivik to be transferred back to a high-security prison, even if his insanity diagnosis is upheld and he later is declared cured.

She pointed to a ruling handed down by Norway’s Supreme Court just 10 days before Breivik bombed Norway’s government headquarters and then carried out a massacre at a Labour Party summer camp. His attacks on July 22 left 77 persons dead and caused billions of kroner in damage.

Another ‘cured’ defendant put back in prison
On July 12, Norway’s highest court ruled in another case that a man convicted of aggravated assault, threats and kidnapping, who also had been declared criminally insane, could be transferred back to a prison when declared “too healthy” for further treatment in a psychiatric institution. The reason: The court believed he remained dangerous and thus posed a threat to society.

“If (Breivik) no longer is sick, but still dangerous, there’s a decision that makes it possible to transfer him to an institution within the prison system,” Engh told Klassekampen.

The Supreme Court ruling was controversial and Klassekampen reported that the defense attorney for the man involved is considering an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. Engh said it was difficult to say how probable it is that the ruling will be used in Breivik’s case, but the possibility is there.

Public outrage
Other attorneys already have claimed they can use the law itself, from 2002, to keep Breivik in custoday. It was approved as a means of protecting the public from persons who can’t be held responsible for their actions because of mental illness, but who nonetheless are viewed as dangerous even after allegedly being cured. The 2002 law allows for incarceration after release from a psychiatric institution.

Given public outrage over Breivik’s crimes, it’s likely efforts will be made to keep him locked up. Momentum is also building in legal circles, including at the highest levels of Norway’s court system, to reevaluate current law by discussing why mentally ill persons can be exempt from punishment. Several politicians support moves to allow for punishment of mentally ill persons. Any change in law, however, would not apply to Breivik since it couldn’t have a retroactive effect.

Moves are also underway to challenge the court-appointed psychiatrists’ declaration that Breivik is criminally insane. Many Norwegians, among them people in influential positions, simply can’t understand how a man who so carefully planned his attacks, carried them out in cold-blooded manner and shows no regret can be considered insane and thereby escape punishment. They don’t think treatment at a psychiatrist institution is secure enough or an appropriate response to Breivik’s actions.

New demands from Breivik
More details from the court-appointed psychiatrists’ 243-page evaluation and diagnosis of Breivik continue to emerge, meanwhile, and reveal that Breivik issued a new series of demands during interviews with the psychiatrists.

Newspaper Aftenposten reported that Breivik wants the Norwegian police to set up three new organizations, funded with NOK 30 million (about USD 5 million) each, to look after the interests of Norway’s indigenous peoples, to stop the “Islamification” of Europe and to provide for the breeding of more Norwegians. The latter, referred to at Tuesday’s press conference on the psychiatrists’ report, involves Breivik’s desire to set up reservations where breeding projects would be carried out.

Breivik also wants to establish a new daily newspaper, apparently to spread his right-wing extremist views, and create a right-wing version of the so-called Blitz House in Oslo, which caters to left-wing youth who often demonstrate against racism.

“If all this is fulfilled, we will refrain from (use of) chemical, biological and flammable weapons,” Breivik told the psychiatrists, apparently referring to the “resistance movement” he claims to lead. Breivik also issued other death threats, reported Aftenposten.

Views and News from Norway/Nina Berglund

Please support our stories by clicking on the “Donate” button now:




  • Tranh hieu

    Its really funny how Norwegian govt. call this terrorist as Mad Man ? By doing this you will give birth of more terrorist like him ….. Thanks Allah (god) ,,, he is not a muslim,, otherwise you could start a war against Muslim ….. But you are not using the word “terrorist” for him only because he is christian and zionist???? C’m on. Dont patronize these type of people to grow up.

  • http://www.facebook.com/traviscl Travis Cleveland

    It seems to me, in these situations, there should be a finding of “Insane and Guilty.” When “psychotic,” the subject being held in a pyschiatric institution and when “in remission,” being incarcerated in prison. That policy would make for a handle and preclude the idea that when sanity returns the subject is ready for return to society.

  • Southernfjord

    Just because he has some sort of mental disorder does not mean he didn’t know what he was doing. He knew darn well that he was committing an act of terror which is why he continues to make threats, because he believes he has scared the Norwegian people. He also took steps to keep from getting caught, like starting his own business to cover his large purchases of fertilizer. There’s no way a psychotic person would have managed it. He knew what he was doing and he should be punished to the fullest extent that Norway allows, even though he deserves much worse.

  • http://profiles.google.com/elronxenu Nick Andrew

    “Many Norwegians, among them people in influential positions, simply can’t understand how a man who so carefully planned his attacks, carried them out in cold-blooded manner and shows no regret can be considered insane and thereby escape punishment.”

    This is an invalid argument from incredulity. An insane person is not necessarily drooling in a corner, nor is a person with no control over their body necessarily insane. Breivik’s brain is broken in that he perceived something which isn’t there (islamification of Norway) but more importantly, he thought it was a good idea to respond to that with a massacre of tens of his fellow citizens, knowing the likely consequences.

    Throwing him in jail until he dies will not bring back a single victim. Nor will it discourage other would-be terrorists, as their own broken brains see their own death as a justifiable cost for carrying out their terrorist plans.

    There is no question that Breivik is presently dangerous to society; he must be restrained for the safety of all. However there is a possibility that therapy can make him sane in the future, or at least remove his psychotic and murderous notions. A sane Breivik would regret his past actions and could contribute meaningfully.

    It may be that we cannot be sure that he has been cured, and we cannot take the chance of releasing him. One more death due to Breivik is one too many. It may be that he can contribute only within an institution designed to keep him away from the rest of us.

    The important task which lies ahead of us is to understand how Breivik became insane – how these false notions became part of his worldview and were not corrected by exposure to facts or correct ethical thinking. We need to understand the conditions which caused this, and work to eliminate the conditions – through education or social rehabilitation, for example – for the sake of the lives of human beings who would be the target of the next mass murderer.